Zhang X., Y. Wang, S. Lee, K. Liang, K. Zhao, G.W. McCarty, J.G. Alfieri, G.E. Moglen, W.D. Hively, D.T. Myers, D. Oviedo-Vargas, T.V. Nguyen, A.L. Hinson, L. Du, and X.X. Romeiko. 2024. Journal of Environmental Management 371: 123104.
Abstract
Winter cover crops (WCCs) are promising best management practices for reducing nitrogen and sediment pollution and increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in agricultural fields. Although previous watershed studies assessed water quality benefits of growing WCCs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, the SOC sequestration impacts remain largely unknown. Here, we designed six WCC scenarios in the Tuckahoe Watershed (TW) to understand potential synergies or tradeoffs between multiple impacts of WCCs. Besides corroborating the nitrate reduction benefits of WCCs that have been reported in previous studies, our results also demonstrated comparable reduction in sediment. We also found that the six WCC scenarios can sequester 0.45–0.92 MgC ha−1 yr−1, with early-planted WCCs having more than 70% SOC sequestration benefits compared with their late-planted counterparts. With a linear extrapolation to all the cropland in Maryland, WCCs hold potential to contribute 2.1–4.4% toward Maryland’s 2030 Greenhouse Gases reduction goal. Additionally, we showed that WCCs can noticeably increase evapotranspiration and decrease water yield and streamflow, potentially impacting aquatic ecosystem health and water supply. Overall, this study highlights the synergistic water quality and SOC sequestration benefits of WCCs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Meanwhile, sustainable adoption of WCCs into existing crop rotations will also require careful assessment of their impact on water availability.
